The landscape of digital tracking is rapidly evolving. With increasing privacy regulations and browser restrictions limiting traditional tracking methods, businesses must adapt to maintain effective data collection and analysis. Server to server (S2S) tracking has emerged as a more reliable and future-proof approach compared to traditional cookie-based tracking.
Let’s examine the key differences between these tracking methods to help businesses navigate the shift toward more privacy-centric options.
What is Cookie-Based Tracking and How Does it Work?
Before exploring server-side tracking, let’s break down cookie-based tracking and how it has been traditionally used to analyze user behaviors.
First-Party vs Third-Party Cookies
First-party cookies are created by the website domain the user visits. For example, if you visit redtrack.com, that domain sets a first-party cookie to remember data like items in your shopping cart or user preferences. These cookies enhance the user experience.
In contrast, third-party cookies are set by external vendors like analytics platforms or advertising networks. When a user visits a website, it triggers scripts from third parties to drop tracking cookies. This allows behavior data to be collected across different sites for ad targeting or analytics. However, third-party cookies face rising privacy concerns.
Pros of Cookie Tracking
Cookie tracking became widespread due to advantages like:
- Ease of implementation: Adding a basic tracking pixel only takes a few lines of code.
- Familiarity for users: Most internet users are familiar with cookies as a long-standing technology.
- Quick deployment: Cookies enable marketers to start gathering user insights rapidly.
- Device recognition: Cookies can help identify users across browsers and devices, unless cookies are cleared.
Cons and Challenges of Cookies
However, reliance on browser cookies also poses disadvantages, including:
- Accuracy issues: Cookies get frequently deleted or blocked, leading to data loss.
- Cross-device tracking challenges: Tracking users across multiple devices is less reliable with separate browser cookie pools.
- Privacy concerns: The invasive nature of third-party tracking cookies is worrying for many users.
- Impact of ad blockers: Ad blockers and anti-tracking tools prevent cookie-based tracking, affecting data.
Understanding Server-to-Server Tracking
Given cookie limitations, server to server tracking has emerged as an alternative for compliance and accuracy.
How Does Server-Side Tracking Work?
With server-side tracking, unique identifiers get captured on advertisement clicks or other website interactions. These identifiers get stored and matched on the advertiser’s server rather than relying on browser cookies.
For example, clicks on Google Ads append parameters like gclid to the landing page URL. The advertiser’s server stores this gclid and matches it to later conversion events for tracking. No browser cookies are required!
Benefits of Server-Side Tracking
Key advantages of server-to-server tracking include:
- Enhanced accuracy and reliability: Server-side tracking avoids issues with cookie deletion while reducing discrepancies in the data.
- Cross-device tracking: Server-side tracking identifies users across browsers and devices for a complete picture of customer journeys.
- Privacy compliance: Data stays on servers rather than browsers, improving privacy for users.
- Control over data: Businesses govern how data gets managed and shared from their servers.
Challenges with Server-Side Tracking
However, S2S tracking also poses implementation hurdles like:
- Complex technical setup: Getting server-side tracking running requires API expertise beyond basic website tags.
- Potential delays in data: Server logs may not update conversion data as rapidly as browser pixels.
- Can be blocked by privacy tools: Parameters like gclid can get stripped out by security filters, limiting attribution.
Comparison of Tracking Approaches
Evaluating choices between cookie-based and server-side tracking depends on several factors.
Aspect | Cookie-Based Tracking | Server-Side Tracking |
Reliance on Cookies | High dependence on cookies. | Does not rely on cookies; removes browsers from equation for resilience. |
Privacy and Compliance | Less controlled consent enforcement and data protection. | Better consent enforcement and data protection to meet regulations. |
Data Collection Differences | Provides detailed behavioral insights from browsers; susceptible to blocking. | Focuses on attribution, less detailed on individual browser behavior but more resilient to blocking. |
Navigating Cookie Deprecation with Server-Side Tracking
With cookies getting phased out, S2S tracking future-proofs data collection.
Drivers Towards Server-Side Tracking
The acceleration towards server-side tracking is fueled by two key factors. Firstly, privacy regulations like GDPR are imposing more scrutiny and constraints around third-party cookies, limiting their reliability. Secondly, as users become more privacy-conscious, cookie deletion is becoming more common, leading to rising concerns around the accuracy of cookie-based tracking over time.
Solutions for Improved Server-Side Tracking
There are two valuable tools businesses can leverage to enhance their server-side tracking implementations. The first is Google Tag Manager, which simplifies deployment significantly without needing advanced web developer resources. The second is implementing custom loaders, which provide greater control over exactly when and how tracking scripts are triggered. This allows for optimizing accuracy around key events.
Mitigating the Impact of ITP on Tracking Duration
Apple’s Intelligent Tracking Prevention (ITP) technology poses a challenge by restricting the lifespan of cookies. However, businesses can maximize cookie duration with server-side approaches that automatically refresh cookies in the background. This cookie refresh approach counteracts ITP limitations, ensuring cookies remain active for extended tracking.
Ensuring Privacy Compliance
To meet privacy regulations using server-side tracking, there are three central requirements businesses must address. Firstly, proper consent mechanisms must be in place to obtain user permission before capturing any data. Secondly, transparency around tracking practices and the use of data is important for user awareness. Finally, regular audits should validate that all data flows and processes align strictly with internal policies as well as external regulations.
The Future of Tracking in a Privacy-Focused Landscape
User privacy will continue taking the spotlight as data regulations expand and user awareness around tracking rises. This growing emphasis on privacy is also driving an increase in tools that allow users more control over their data. Expect platforms to provide more advanced preference customization features enabling people to dictate how and when their personal information gets accessed.
Simultaneously, businesses will respond through ongoing innovation in the space of privacy-compliant tracking. New techniques will continue emerging that balance gathering customer insights with adhering to stricter compliance standards. As privacy demands accelerate, the capacity to pivot strategies while respecting user preferences will differentiate market leaders. The companies that adapt most adeptly to this changing climate will gain a competitive advantage.
Conclusion
As third-party cookie support declines, businesses must reassess tracking strategies with privacy topping priorities. Migrating to reliable server-side tracking future-proofs your website analytics while respecting user preferences. With the right solutions and phased deployment, businesses can adapt to the cookieless future with positive outcomes all around.